Homepage › Solution manuals › Tom Leinster › Galois Theory › Exercise 6.2.7 (Splitting field equivalence)
Exercise 6.2.7 (Splitting field equivalence)
Show that (ii) can equivalently be replaced by: ‘if is a subfield of containing , and splits in , then ’.
Answers
Solution: We first show ().
We have that and so
is well defined. We
then take a basis
of over
. Then we have
that every subfield
of containing
is a
-linear subspace
of . So if
, which would
mean that
splits in ,
then .
We then show ().
We have that ,
and for
some
and .
Then the result follows trivially from Proposition 5.2.4.
Comments
-
If $M = K(\alpha_1,\ldots,\alpha_n)$, $\alpha_1,\ldots,\alpha_n$ is not a linear basis of $M$ over $K$ (for instance, a basis of $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{2},\sqrt{3})$ over $\mathbb{Q}$ is $(1,\sqrt{2}, \sqrt{3}, \sqrt{6})$ by th e tower theorem).richardganaye • 2024-06-02
Proof. Here , and is a field extension.
Consider the propositions
- i.
- splits in .
- ii.
- , where are the roots of in .
- ii’.
- if is a subfield of containing , and splits in , then
We must prove .
-
Assume (i) and (ii). Let
be a subfield of
containing
such that
splits in
. Then
where are the roots of in (with possible repetitions).
Since , are the roots of in , and (ii) shows that .
Then and , thus .
-
Assume (i) and (ii’).
By (i), , where are the roots of in (with repetitions).
Consider the subfield . Then , and is the leading coefficient of , thus . Therefore splits in . By (ii’), , and this proves that , so (ii) is true.