Homepage Solution manuals Tom Leinster Galois Theory Exercise 6.2.9 (Splitting field example)

Exercise 6.2.9 (Splitting field example)

In Example 6.2.8(iii), I said that (ξ,ωξ,ω2ξ) = (ξ,ω). Why is that true?

Answers

Solution: ω = e2πi3 = 1+i3 2 , and hence ω2 = 1i3 2 . and hence we see that ω2 is a rational multiple of ω, hence (ξ,ωξ,ω2ξ) = (ξ,ω).

As an aside, we know that (ξ) = {a + + cξ2 : a,b,c }, and hence {1,ξ,ξ2} forms a basis for (ξ) : . Similarly, {1,ω} forms a basis for (ξ,ω) : (ξ). By Theorem 5.1.17 (Tower Law)(i) we then have that {1,ξ,ξ2,ω,ξω,ξ2ω} forms a basis for (ξ,ω) : .

User profile picture
HN
2022-11-11 07:03
Comments
  • $\omega^2 = -1 - \omega$ is not a rational multiple of $\omega$.
    richardganaye2024-06-02

Proof. The field ( ξ , ω ) contains ξ and ω , thus it contains ξ , ωξ , ω 2 ξ .

So ( ξ , ω ) , and { ξ , ωξ , ω 2 ξ } ( ξ , ω ) . Since ( ξ , ωξ , ω 2 ξ ) is the smallest subfield of containing and { ξ , ωξ , ω 2 ξ } , we obtain

( ξ , ωξ , ω 2 ξ ) ( ξ , ω ) .

Conversely, ξ ( ξ , ωξ , ω 2 ξ ) , and ω = ( ωξ ) ξ ( ξ , ωξ , ω 2 ξ ) . Thus ( ξ , ωξ , ω 2 ξ ) , and { ω , ξ } ( ξ , ωξ , ω 2 ξ ) . Since ( ξ , ω ) is the smallest field satisfying these two properties,

( ξ , ω ) ( ξ , ωξ , ω 2 ξ ) .

We have proved

( ξ , ωξ , ω 2 ξ ) = ( ξ , ω ) .

User profile picture
2024-06-02 07:26
Comments