Exercise 3.14

Exercise 14: If { s n } is complex sequence, define its arithmetic means σ n by

σ n = s 0 + s 1 + + s n n + 1 ( n = 0 , 1 , 2 , ) .

(a) If lim s n = s , prove that lim σ n = s .

(b) Construct a sequence { s n } which does not converge, although lim σ n = 0 .

(c) Can it happen that s n > 0 for all n and that limsup s n = , although lim σ n = 0 ?

(d) Put a n = s n s n 1 , for n 1 . Show that

s n σ n = 1 n + 1 k = 1 n k a k .

Assume that lim ( n a n ) = 0 and { σ n } converges. Prove that { s n } converges.

(e) Derive the last conclusion from a weaker hypothesis: Assume M < , | n a n | M for all n , and lim σ n = σ . Prove that lim s n = σ .

Answers

(a) Choose 𝜖 > 0 and N such that | s n s m | < 𝜖 2 for all n , m > N . Then choose M such that

| ( s 0 s ) + + ( s N 1 s ) M | < 𝜖 2

Then whenever n > max ( M , N )

| ( s 0 s ) + + ( s n s ) n + 1 | | ( s 0 s ) + + ( s N 1 s ) n + 1 | + | ( S N s ) + + ( S n s ) n + 1 | < 𝜖 2 + 𝜖 2 = 𝜖

This shows that ( σ n s ) converges to 0 , i.e. that σ n s .

(b) Let s n = ( 1 ) n . Then s n does not converge, but σ n = 1 + ( 1 ) n 2 ( n + 1 ) converges to 0 .

(c) Yes. Let a n = 1 2 n , b 2 n = n , and b n = 0 when n is not a power of 2 . Let s n = a n + b n . Then s n > 0 , and the series is unbounded, so limsup s n = . However

0 < σ n = 1 n + 1 i = 0 n 1 2 i + 1 n + 1 i = 0 log 2 ( n ) i < 2 n + log 2 ( n ) 2 n

where the right hand side tends to 0. This shows that σ n 0 .

(d) Note that

k = 1 n k ( s k s k 1 ) = k = 1 n k s k k = 0 n 1 ( k + 1 ) s k = n s n k = 0 n 1 s k = ( n + 1 ) s n k = 0 n s k

so that

s n σ n = 1 n + 1 k = 0 n k a k

Note that the right hand side is the n th arithmetic mean of the sequence n a n , which by assumption and our result in (a) converges. Therefore s n σ n is convergent, and since σ n is convergent by assumption, ( s n σ n ) + σ n = s n is convergent.

(e)

s n σ n = s n k = 0 n s k n + 1 = s n k = 0 n ( 1 n m m + 1 ( n + 1 ) ( n m ) ) s k = k = 0 m ( ( m + 1 ) s k ( n + 1 ) ( n m ) s k n m ) + k = m + 1 n ( ( m + 1 ) s k ( n + 1 ) ( n m ) + s n s k n m ) = m + 1 n m ( k = 0 n s k n + 1 k = 0 m s k m + 1 ) + 1 n m k = m + 1 n ( s n s k )

which is the desired equality. By assumption | s n s n 1 | < M n , so that

| s n s t | = | ( s n s n 1 ) + ( s n 1 s n 2 ) + + ( s i + 1 s i ) | M n + + M i + 1 ( n i ) M i + 1

The rest of the argument is covered in sufficient detail in the text.

User profile picture
2023-08-07 00:00
Comments