Exercise 3.18

Exercise 18: Replace the recursion formula of Exercise 16 by

x n + 1 = p 1 p x n + α p x n p + 1

where p is a fixed positive integer, and describe the behavior of the resulting sequences { x n } .

Answers

Lemma 3.18.1: For an integer p 1 and real a where 0 < a < 1

p ( 1 a ) 1 a p .

Proof: We have

p = n = 0 p 1 1 = n = 0 p 1 1 n n = 0 p 1 a n (equality when  p = 1 ) = 1 a 1 a n = 0 p 1 a n = 1 1 a ( n = 0 p 1 a n a n = 0 p 1 a n ) (since  1 a 0 ) = 1 1 a ( n = 0 p 1 a n n = 0 p 1 a n + 1 ) = 1 1 a ( n = 0 p 1 a n n = 1 p a n ) = 1 1 a ( a 0 + n = 1 p 1 a n n = 1 p 1 a n a p ) = 1 1 a ( 1 a p ) .

From this the desired result follows immediately since 1 a > 0 . □

Now we assume that for this family of sequences we always have x 1 > α p and we claim that the sequence converges to α p for a given p . So assume that p is a fixed positive integer. First we claim that x n > α p for all n 1 . We show this by induction. The n = 1 case is by construction so assume that x n > α p . We then have

x n > α p > 0
1 > α p x n > 0 .

So then by Lemma 3.18.1 above we have

p ( 1 α p x n ) 1 ( α p x n ) p p p α p x n 1 α x n p p + α x n p 1 + p α p x n p x n + α x n p 1 x n + p α p (since  x n > 0 ) ( p 1 ) x n + α x n p 1 p α p p 1 p x n + α p x n p 1 α p x n + 1 α p .

Given this it is easy to show that { x n } decreases monotonically. Since x n α p for any n 1 , clearly x n p α . Therefore we have

x n + 1 = p 1 p x n + α p x n p 1 p 1 p x n + x n p p x n p 1 = p 1 p x n + x n p = p 1 + 1 p x n = p p x n = x n .

So since { x n } is bounded (above by x 1 and below by α p ) and monotic, it converges by Theorem 3.14. So let x = lim n x n , and then clearly lim n x n + 1 = lim n x n = x also. Therefore we have

lim n x n + 1 = lim n ( p 1 p x n + α p x n p 1 )
= ( p 1 p lim n x n + α p lim n x n p 1 )
= ( p 1 p x + α p x p 1 ) = x .

Solving this straightforward equation for x results in x = α p .

Thus these sequences provide a means by which the p th root of a real number can be calculated (approximately), and it is worth mentioning that the p = 2 case corresponds to the sequence in Exercise 3.16 for the square root.

User profile picture
2023-08-07 00:00
Comments

Assume x 1 > 0 . Then x n > 0 .

Similarly to Exercise 3.16, we conjecture the following two properties and prove them:

(a) { x n } decreases monotonically for n 2 ;

(b) lim x n = α p .

Since

x n + 1 x n = p 1 p + α x n p p ,

to prove (a), it suffices to show that

α x n p 1 for n 2 ,

which is equivalent to

x n α p for n 2 .
(1)

We now prove (1).

x n + 1 α p = p 1 p x n α 1 p + α 1 1 p p x n p + 1 = p 1 p x n α 1 p + 1 p ( x n α 1 p ) p + 1 .
(2)

For

f ( y ) = p 1 p y + 1 p y p + 1 ,

since

f ( y ) = p 1 p ( 1 y p ) { < 0 , 0 < y < 1 > 0 , y > 1 ,

f ( y ) f ( 1 ) = 1 for y > 0 . By (2),

x n + 1 α p ,

implying (1). This proves (a).

Since { x n } is monotonic and bounded, it converges. Let x = lim x n . Then lim x n + 1 = x . Taking the limits of the LHS and RHS of the condition in the question implies

x = p 1 p x + α p x p + 1 ,

which implies x = α p . This proves (b).

User profile picture
2025-08-29 20:51
Comments