Exercise 3.19

Exercise 19: Associate to each sequence a = { α n } , in which α n is 0 or 2, the real number

x ( a ) = n = 1 α n 3 n .

Prove that the set of all x ( a ) is precisely the Cantor set described in Sec. 2.44.

Answers

Let A denote the set of all α sequences as defined in the text and let x ( A ) = { x ( α ) : α A } .

For a given sequence α A let

β n = α n 3 n

We first show that x ( α ) = β n converges. So consider any α A . If { α n } ends in all zeros (i.e. there is an N 1 where α n = 0 for all n N ) then clearly β n is effectively finite and so therefore converges. If this is not the case then { α n } clearly has a subsequence { α k n } where α k n = 2 for all n 1 . Then, noting that obviously β n 0 , we have

limsup n | β n | n = limsup n β n n = limsup n α n 3 n n = limsup n α n n 3 = lim n α k n n 3 = lim n 2 n 3 = 1 3 ,

where we have invoked Theorem 3.20b. It follows then from the Root Test (Theorem 3.33) that β n converges.

Now, for a sequence α A , x ( α ) is the real number whose representation in base three is 0 . α 1 α 2 α 3 , i.e. α n is the n th digit after the decimal point. Clearly if α n = 0 for all n 1 then x ( α ) = 0 . We also note that if α n = 2 for all n 1 then we have

x ( α ) = n = 1 α n 3 n = n = 1 2 3 n = 2 n = 1 ( 1 3 ) n = 2 [ n = 0 ( 1 3 ) n 1 ] = 2 [ 1 1 1 3 1 ] = 1 ,

analagously to the way in which 0.99999 = 1 . It follows then that x ( A ) [ 0 , 1 ] .

First consider any m 1 for any α A . We then have

3 m x ( α ) = 3 m n = 1 α n 3 n = n = 1 α n 3 n m = n = 1 m 1 α n 3 n m + n m m α n 3 n m + n = m + 1 α n 3 n m ,

where we adopt the convention that n = p q = 0 for p > q , which is needed for the first sum if m = 1 . Continuing, we have

3 m x ( α ) = n = 1 m 1 3 m n α n + α m + n = m + 1 α n 3 n m = 3 j α , m + α m + n = m + 1 α n 3 n m , (1)

where we define

j α , m = n = 1 m 1 3 m n 1 α n

noting that for the sum

m 1 n 1
1 m n 1
1 m n m 1
0 m n 1 m 2
0 j α , m m 2

so that j α , m is an integer (since the α n are). Note also that j α , 1 = 0 , following the convention. Now we examine the last sum in (1). Letting l = n m so that n = l + m we let

δ α , m = n = m + 1 α n 3 n m = l = 1 α m + l 3 l .

This sum of course depends on α but we can find its bounds. Clearly it will be the lowest when α l + m = 0 for l 1 and the largest when α l + m = 2 for l 1 . We therefore have

0 δ α , m l = 1 2 3 l = 1 .

Recombining this with (1) we have

3 m x ( α ) = 3 j α , m + α m + δ α , m , (2)

where j α , m (where 0 ) and 0 δ α , m 1 .

Moving along, let P denote the Cantor set. Now, by equation (2.24) in the text

y P m + k [ y ( 3 k + 1 3 m , 3 k + 2 3 m ) ] ,

where + denotes the set of positive integers. Note that the text says that k + but this should really be k as written above. This is logically equivalent to

y P m + k [ y ( 3 k + 1 3 m , 3 k + 2 3 m ) ] y P m + k [ ¬ ( y > 3 k + 1 3 m y < 3 k + 2 3 m ) ] y P m + k [ y 3 k + 1 3 m y 3 k + 2 3 m ] y P m + k [ 3 m y 3 k + 1 3 m y 3 k + 2 ] (3)

Finally we show that x ( A ) = P .

( ) Consider any α A and consider any m + and k . If α m = 0 then by (2)

3 j α , m 3 m x ( α ) = 3 j α , m + δ α , m 3 j α , m + 1 .

So in the sub-case where j α , m > k we have j α , m k + 1 so that

3 m x ( α ) 3 j α , m 3 ( k + 1 ) = 3 k + 3 3 k + 2 .

In the other sub-case when j α , m k we have

3 m x ( α ) 3 j α , m + 1 3 k + 1

On the other hand if α m = 2 then again by (2)

3 j α , m + 2 3 m x ( α ) = 3 j α , m + 2 + δ α , m 3 j α , m + 3

So in the sub-case where j α , m k we have

3 m x ( α ) 3 j α , m + 2 3 k + 2 ,

and the other sub-case where j α , m < k we we have j α , m + 1 k so that

3 m x ( α ) 3 j α , m + 3 = 3 ( j α , m + 1 ) 3 k 3 k + 1

Thus, since the cases are exhaustive, we have shown that the right side of (3) is true, from which it follows that x ( α ) P . Since α was an arbitrary sequence, x ( A ) P .

( ) Consider any y P . Then clearly y [ 0 , 1 ] . So let α be the sequence corresponding to the base three representation of y as described above; thus y = x ( α ) . If α contains only zeros and twos, i.e. α n { 0 , 2 } for all n 1 then clearly α A so that y x ( A ) . So suppose that there is an n 1 where α n = 1 . We will show that this is the only digit that is one and that, furthermore, there is an α such that α A and x ( α ) = x ( α ) = y .

So let m be the index of the first digit that is a one, i.e. m = min { k + : α k = 1 } . Then since y P , m + , and j α , m we have 3 m y 3 j α , m + 1 or 3 m y j α , m + 2 by (3).

If 3 m y 3 j α , m + 1 then since y = x ( α ) we have by (2)

3 m y 3 j α , m + 1
3 j α , m + α m + δ α , m 3 j α , m + 1
1 + δ α , m 1
δ α , m 0 .

Since also we know that δ α , m 0 it has to be that δ α , m = 0 , which implies that every digit after α m is zero so that α m is the only digit that is one. But then we can form α where

α k = { α k if  k < m 0 if  k = m 2 if  k > m .

Clearly x ( α ) = x ( α ) = y and α A .

If 3 m y 3 j α , m + 2 then we again have by (2)

3 m y 3 j α , m + 2
3 j α , m + α m + δ α , m 3 j α , m + 2
1 + δ α , m 2
δ α , m 1 .

Since we also know that δ α , m 1 it has to be that δ α , m = 1 , which means that α k = 2 for k > m , i.e. the base three representation of x ( α ) ends in infinitely many twos after the one. Then we can construct a terminating α where

α k = { α k if  k < m 2 if  k = m 0 if  k > m .

Again clearly x ( α ) = x ( α ) = y and α A .

Thus in either case there is an α A where y = x ( α ) = x ( α ) so that y x ( A ) . Since y was arbitrary this shows that P x ( A ) , which completes the proof since it has been shown that x ( A ) = P .

User profile picture
2023-08-07 00:00
Comments