Exercise 7.13

Exercise 13: Assume that { f n } is a sequence of monotonically increasing functions on R such that 0 f n ( x ) 1 for all x and all n .

(a) Prove that there is a function f and a sequence { n k } such that for every x R

f ( x ) = lim k f n k ( x ) .

(b) If, moreover, f is continuous, prove that f n k f uniformly on compact sets.

Answers

(analambanomenos, fixed after kyp44 found errors in the original solution)
(a) Following the steps of the hint: (i) Show that some subsequence { f n i } converges at all rational points r , say, to f ( r ) .

Let { r m } be an enumeration of the rational points of R . Since { f n ( r 1 ) } [ 0 , 1 ] , a compact set, there is a subsequence { f 1 , n j ( r 1 ) } which converges to f ( r 1 ) , by Theorem 2.41. Similarly, the { f 1 , n j ( r 2 ) } has a subsequence { f 2 , n j ( r 2 ) } which converges to f ( r 2 ) . Continuing in this fashion, we get a sequence of subsequences { f m , n j } such that each { f m , n j } is a subsequence of { f m 1 , n j } and f m , n j ( r m ) converges to f ( r m ) . Letting f n i = f i , n i , we get a subsequence of { f n } which converges on all rational points r of R to f ( r ) .

(ii) Define f ( x ) , for any x R , to be sup f ( r ) , the sup being taken over all rational points r x .

First we need to show that this new definition of f ( r ) agrees with the previous one; let f ( r ) be the new definition of f ( r ) . It is clear from the definition that f ( r ) f ( r ) . Suppose f ( r ) > f ( r ) , that is, there is a rational point q < r and a real number a such that f ( q ) > a > f ( r ) . Since f ( q ) = lim f n i ( q ) , and f ( r ) = lim f n i ( r ) , there is an integer N such that for all i N we have f n i ( q ) > a > f n i ( r ) , but this contradicts the fact that these functions are monotonically increasing.

It is clear from the definition that f is monotonically increasing.

(iii) Show that f n i ( x ) f ( x ) at every x at which f is continuous.

Suppose f is continuous at x and let 𝜀 > 0 . Then there are rational numbers r 1 < x < r 2 such that

f ( x ) 𝜀 2 < f ( r 1 ) f ( x ) f ( r 2 ) < f ( x ) + 𝜀 2 .

Since f n i ( r 1 ) f ( r 1 ) and f n i ( r 2 ) f ( r 2 ) , there is an integer N such that for all i > N we have

| f n i ( r 1 ) f ( r 1 ) | < 𝜀 2 and | f n i ( r 2 ) f ( r 2 ) | < 𝜀 2 .

And since f n i is monotonically increasing, we have for all i > N

f ( x ) 𝜀 < f ( r 1 ) 𝜀 2 < f n i ( r 1 ) f n i ( x ) f n i ( r 2 ) < f ( r 2 ) + 𝜀 2 < f ( x ) + 𝜀 .

That is, | f ( x ) f n i ( x ) | < 𝜀 , so f n i ( x ) f ( x ) as i .

(iv) Show that a subsequence of { f n i } converges at every point of discontinuity of f since there are at most countably many such points.

Since f is monotonically increasing, f has at most countably many simple points of discontinuity by Theorems 4.29 and 4.30. Let { x m } be an enumeration of the points of discontinuity of f . Repeating the argument of step (i), there is a subsequence { f 1 , n j ( x 1 ) } of { f n i ( x 1 ) which converges to a value a between 0 and 1. We can continue this way for all the x m , getting a sequence of subsequences { f m , n j } of { f n i } such that each { f m , n j } is a subsequence of { f m 1 , n j } for which f m , n j ( x m ) converges. Letting f n k = f k , n k , we get a subsequence of { f n } which converges at all the points { x m } . We can redefine f ( x i ) at these points to be those values.

Since we have already shown that { f n k } converges at the points where f is continuous, we have f n k ( x ) converging to f ( x ) for all real values x .

(b) Let K be a compact subset of R and let 𝜀 > 0 . It was shown in step (iii) of part (a) that, since f is everywhere continuous, f ( x ) = lim f n k ( x ) for all points x . Also, we are using the initial definition of f , so that is it monotonically increasing. For each x K there is a δ x > 0 such that for all y [ x δ x , x + δ x ] we have

| f ( y ) f ( x ) | < 𝜀 4 .

User profile picture
2023-08-07 00:00
Comments