Homepage › Solution manuals › Walter Rudin › Principles of Mathematical Analysis › Exercise 9.21
Exercise 9.21
Exercise 21: Define in by
(a) Find the four points of at which the gradient of is zero. Show that as exactly one local maximum and one local minimum in .
(b) Let be the set of all at which . Find those points of that have no neighborhoods in which the equation can be solved for in terms of (or for in terms of ). Describe as precisely as you can.
Answers
(a) We have so if or . Also, so if or . Hence the gradient of equals 0 at the four points , , , and . To tell whether these are local maxima or minima, or saddle points, the easiest way is to apply the second derivative test for multivariable functions, which involves finding the eigenvalues of the matrix of second derivatives (the “Hessian”) at these points, but that wasn’t demonstrated in the text, so we need to show this more directly.
At , for small values and , we have
which is positive for small values of and . Hence has a local minimum at .
Similarly, at we have
which is negative for small values of and . Hence has a local maximum at .
At can be shown to have a local maximum at , using the usual calculus techniques. However, has a local minimum at . Hence is a saddle point for .
Similarly, at has a local minimum at , but has a local maximum at . Hence is also a saddle point for .
(b) Note that
The first factor shows that is equal to zero along the diagonal . The zero set of the second factor of degree 2 must be some sort of conic section. Converting to polar coordinates we get
which can be seen to describe a ellipse symmetric with the diagonal line and intersecting it at the points and .
The points of the zero set along the diagonal satisfy the relation except at the two intersection points, where we cannot describe or as single-valued functions of each other.
Let . Along the zero set of , cannot be expressed as a function of where . (I am using the elliptical zero set as described above; the general case is more complicated.) That is, we are looking for the intersection of the zero set of with the line , which occurs at the points and .
Similarly, cannot be expressed as a function of where , so we are looking for the intersection of the zero set of with the line , which occurs at the points and .