Exercise 2.1

Let { f n } be a sequence of real nonnegative functions on R 1 , and consider the following four statements:

(a)
If f 1 and f 2 are upper semicontinuous, then f 1 + f 2 is upper semicontinuous.
(b)
If f 1 and f 2 are lower semicontinuous, then f 1 + f 2 is lower semicontinuous.
(c)
If each f n is upper semicontinuous, then 1 f n is upper semicontinuous.
(d)
If each f n is lower semicontinuous, then 1 f n is lower semicontinuous.

Show that three of these are true and that one is false. What happens if the word “nonnegative” is omitted? Is the truth of the statements affected if R 1 is replaced by a general topological space?

Answers

Proof. ( a ) is true without the nonnegative hypothesis nor assuming f i are functions on R 1 since

( f 1 + f 2 ) 1 ( [ , α ) ) = { x f 1 ( x ) + f 2 ( x ) < α } = N R f 1 1 ( [ , N ) ) f 2 1 ( [ , N α ) )

is open. Likewise, ( b ) is true without the nonnegative hypothesis nor assuming f i are functions on R 1 since

( f 1 + f 2 ) 1 ( ( α , ] ) = { x f 1 ( x ) + f 2 ( x ) > α } = N R f 1 1 ( ( N , ] ) f 2 1 ( ( N α , ] )

is open.

Now we claim ( c ) is false even in the case stated. Let h n be the function defined as

h n ( x ) = { 0 if x ≤ 0, nx if 0 ≤ x ≤ 1∕n, 1 if x ≥ 1∕n.

Each h n is continuous by definition. Now let f n = h n h n 1 where h 0 = 0 . Then, 1 N f n = h N , and so

n = 1 f n = { 0 if x ≤ 0, 1 if x > 0

is not upper semicontinuous.

Now we claim ( d ) is true even if R 1 is replaced by a general topological space, but not if we remove the condition that the f n are nonnegative. ( d ) is true under the stated hypotheses since 1 f n is the infimum of the collection of partial sums 1 N f n , and then by ( 2.8 ( c ) ) . On the other hand, we can take the negative of the example for ( c ) to show the hypothesis that the f n are nonnegative is necessary. □

User profile picture
2021-12-22 00:00
Comments