Exercise 2.4

Exercise 1. Examine the proof of the Riesz theorem and prove the following two statements:

(a)
If E 1 V 1 and E 2 V 2 , where V 1 and V 2 are disjoint open sets, then μ ( E 1 E 2 ) = μ ( E 1 ) + μ ( E 2 ) , even if E 1 and E 2 are not in 𝔐 .
(b)
If E 𝔐 F , then E = N K 1 K 2 , where { K i } is a disjoint countable collection of compact sets and μ ( N ) = 0 .

Answers

Proof of ( a ) . By Step I of the proof, we have the inequality μ ( E 1 E 2 ) μ ( E 1 ) + μ ( E 2 ) , so it suffices to show the converse. Let W E 1 E 2 be open. Then, μ ( W ) μ ( W V 1 ) + μ ( W V 2 ) μ ( E 1 ) + μ ( E 2 ) . Taking the infimum over all W E 1 E 2 , we have μ ( E 1 E 2 ) μ ( E 1 ) + μ ( E 2 ) . □

Proof of ( b ) . Since E = E 0 𝔐 F , by Step V there is a compact K 1 and an open V 1 such that K 1 E 0 V 1 and μ ( V 1 K 1 ) < 1 . By Step VI, since K 1 𝔐 F , we have E 1 : = E 0 K 1 𝔐 F . Inductively, we can construct from E n 1 a compact set K n and an open set V n such that μ ( V n K n ) < 1 n , and a new E n : = E n 1 K n 𝔐 F . By construction, each K n is disjoint. We now claim that N : = E 1 K n has measure zero. But we have

E n = 1 K n = n = 1 E K n n = 1 V n K n ,

whose measure is < 1 n for each n , so μ ( N ) = 0 . □

User profile picture
2021-12-22 00:00
Comments